The term:
"FAG/S":
And, yeah - I know that
the use of the term "FAG" is massively politically incorrect. However,
HISTORICALLY it
was a term used as a knee-jerk reaction by adolescent guys who were/are not
interested in tempering their visceral gut reactions with
politically-corrected terminology. Men know by INSTINCT (say
"INSTINCT") that gender-nonconforming men are creepy.
CREEPY
is an actual feeling.
Understanding this is very essential. CREEPY things
are perceived that way because there is an ambiguous set of signals that the brain interprets
as potentially dangerous and borderline disgusting.
And
this instinctual perception is NOT open to shaming in the name of
political-correctness because it is a gut, visceral
reaction. And in many cases, it's often a life-preserving visceral
reaction. So before the priests of political correctness lecture us
about using "mean-language", -there needs to be some investigation on their
part (especially if they're a proponent of evolution) into the overall
society-protective benefits of using hard, offensive language to label/flag
the creepy. Because when the grim-reaper walks among us -
he often wears a
disguise that has odd imperfections. Recognizing those odd
imperfections may preserve the life of the observer.


|
Finally,
sanity!
I grew up in an
ethnic region not unlike that still seen in many
Eastern Indian communities.
"Indian culture is highly homosocial and displays of affection, body contact and the sharing of beds between men is socially acceptable (Kahn, 1994) This creates opportunities for sexual contact, though sexual behavior in this context is rarely seen as real sex, but as play.
This same-sex sexual activity begins in adolescence between school friends and within family environments and is
non-penetrative. Young men who cultivate such relationships do not consider themselves to be 'homosexual' but conceive their behavior in terms of sexual desire, opportunity and pleasure�"
(Asthana and Oostvogels, 2001: 712)."
I lived in North America. From the age of 12,
I discovered a level of intimacy with certain male friends that we knew was more
"private" & needed to be handled with total discretion -
never even hinted of
outside of the company of the guys involved.
"Fags" were considered to be half-men who acted
like females & took 'it' up the tailpipe. None of us fit that description
& nobody who "might" possibly be amicable to either tendency ever saw the inner
dynamics of our
group. "Nerds & sissies" were completely excluded & it
seemed like those of us involved with each other knew the 'social dangers' of being
implicated with either (effeminate men or those who did the arse-nasty).
I.E: "I was a
teenager in the 2000s, but I attended a boys' boarding school in
Switzerland, where activities of the g0y kind were still common. We had
a
chap in our class who was very effeminate, and he was the most
systematically excluded one from this type of relationships going on quietly
between the rest of us. I have no doubt that he finished school and went
on into life thinking that his peculiarity was same-sex attraction. So I
have an idea of how the concept of the gay could get started." - Blsss
Note: No matter how often G0YS attempt to explain the dynamics
that are described above; - There are people who "proudly identify with the
GLITQetc alphabet soup group who climb up onto their biggest social-virtue box
wearing their highest stilettos & while loudly speaking into a dildo-shaped
microphone - & try to explain "why" that all men who 'like' men are "really all
part of some social thing they called 'gay'". Only someone deprived of
functioning senses or possessing a damaged intellect believes their crap. For
millennia it has been well accepted that men routinely fell in love with other
men. And for the same period of time men who loved men did not treat a man in
the same sexual context of a woman for the simple reason is that anatomy is
different. Anal- -Sex
was ILLEGAL because it caused injury & spread diseases in addition to being on
par with playing in sh!t! Men in ancient cultures who had functioning senses &
intellects knew these things as simple matters of fact. Sexually pleasuring a
friend consisted of frottage using a hand or your penis, & fellatio (especially
69'n) among the most trusted friends. A man loving another man was NOT
pretending that the other was a woman (Because such a fantasy relegated a man
into a sex-object other that what he was as a man)! Such a disrespectful mindset
was that of a rapist or one who would use a male prostitute in such a manner.
When I was a bit older, I moved to a more "urbanized"
region. The atmosphere there was very different from where's I'd come from
& homophobia was a stifling threat that gave every guy pause in regard to
how he carried himself in public.
However, being
15, eh...18, I soon directed my efforts to making
friends & seeing how deeply I could get the relationships to go. Because
I was athletic, aggressive & good looking, -friends were not difficult to
make. Getting them to "loosen up" was a bit more of a challenge.
However, once I did manage to bed a buddy, -& he saw that the act didn't
cause his dick to shrivel or make him grow tits - the friendship usually ramped
up to what I was used to. Our behavior wasn't considered "gay"
by any of us once the arse-plug'n rejection was clearly established (seeing that we
didn't go there). It wasn't unusual for guy to talk about women -even while
still cuddling with his buddy. The perception was that the male/male friendship
was very different than that with a woman. Indeed, it was. There was a
rural swimming hole with moving water too deep for anyone under 5'9". Rumor had
it that "years ago" some sleazy high-school girl got pregnant after being nailed
by several nude boys at the location - so these days the attendance was almost
male & nude swimming was the initiation rite. With all of the contact & water
wrestling, games like chicken & if a shorter guy needed to take a breather - he
either rested nude supported by a nude friend or he'd need to leave the water.
Most guys opted to stay in the water with a taller friend until they caught
their breath. It doesn't take long to learn how to reposition a guy so that his
man parts are in constant state of friction against you under the water. This
process extended for several hours of swimming would often results in raging
erections that were screaming for release & not going down naturally. When these
guys became blue-balls hard they'd get blue around the lips because they were
exhausting themselves swimming & did not want to climb on me for support because
their baton-dick would definitely introduce itself to me. So, I'd notice
blue lips & say something "Danny, take a breather. Your face is taking on a
hypoxic look." I'd give him a quick wink where only they saw it as I held out an
arm. I made it appear like I was going to leave the arm extended but once
a guy took it I'd pull him in & tell him to grab my neck with both hands saying
"Deep breaths & relax. Your color should be back to normal in a few minutes." -
as I pulled his pelvis tight against my abs. At this time any guy would know
that he was busted - clearly having an intense erection. However, I didn't let
on that anything was unusual. Instead, I simply feigned being interested in
whatever happened to be going on - still moving, intercepting frisbee's, water
volleyballs, etc. But the arm I had supporting the guy who was taking a breather
- was positioned under his ass with firm pressure pushing his erection along my
abs or ribs. And as I moved up & down in the water, I moved him the other way.
The friction against my ribs or abs (along with the firm pressure along his
shaft) caused most guys to ejaculate intensely for a good minute or so. Lots of
guys would simply bury their head in the nap of my neck covering the space with
their arms the best they could as they "breathed deeply" as quietly as possible
as their orgasms extorted oxygen too. Most guys recovered within 2-3 minutes
after and as I could feel them shift position in order to rejoin the fun I'd
usually say something like: "Your complexion is less blue & the rest takes a
real load off. Next time don't wait. OK?" Then I'd wink so only the guy saw it.
Once guys knew I totally was trust worthy regarding their sex responses - then
they'd become more brazen with under-water touches, hints & play-groping.
Some of these guys got hard minutes after getting into the water with me.
Wrestling with a guy consisted of what appeared to be horseplay above the water
as
I
covertly held him steady enough under the water to masturbate him until his
penis would surrender that long streamer of egg-white cumm into the current.
These guys became awesome friends. The phrase: "Hang out this week/end.", was
code for doing fun stuff punctuated with lots of satiating sex that was totally
respectful & never b!tched a Bro. It wasn't 'casual', but massively bonding,
relaxing & definitely took away women's attempts to control men by teasing the
libido endlessly in order to get men to give women "stuff" on the ever
lengthening innuendos of eventual sex (lots of manipulative cunts are in
school). Having a friend or 3 who loves & respects you & will operate the
"pump" for you (letting you bask fully in that teeth-clenching
cock-explosion-euphoria) - is a true benefit of male/male best-friendships.
Since the 1970's, such friendships were virtually destroyed by the low-brow,
gender-fuck'd behavior & foul-disrespect the permeates "gay-culture". No decent
guy wanted anything to do with that sh!t. Then the STD explosion into the "gay"
male community happened & continues till this very day. Dirty fag fucks!
But there was never any cheap-talk
insinuating that a guy was seen in disrespect or
referred to as a 'piece of tail' in our (G0YS) group/s. To have diminished the nature of one M2M
friend/relationship with emasculating words or actions was to have cheapened them all & put them on par with
how "gay" relationships were perceived: Cheap, petty, disposable, uncommitted
(Ironically - that is the same light lots of guys see relationships with woman as
being)! It was an amazing & wonderful thing: To be free from the lies
about "the gays owning all M2M intimacy". Generally, these friendships
weren't "monogamous" or exclusive, -but neither were they cheap,
disposable hookups. Although I don't remember a week of different guys in
bed every night, -I do recall weeks where there were 3-4 (only 1 per night,
though). These were good friends who show up at any hour & eventually climb
into the sack because among men, the need for sex is commonly accepted & a
trusted bro who will gladly get you off all night long is a priceless find. The progression from close physical contact to sexual was
generally of the same pattern that occurred over time: A buddy would get
comfortable being massaged, disrobed & eventually I'd discover a guy
sporting wood - at which time I'd take steps to work the tension out of
'it'. "Gay" was rapidly defined as "playing the female
role" & since none of us did that, - we saw ourselves simply as 'buds
with benefits'. And love - did we love each other in the most respectful
& heartfelt ways. It wasn't possessive, clingy or selfish -- but open,
accepting & full of the knowledge that women were a natural part of most
guys lives too - but as a different form of relationship. A best-friend
was someone who knew & accepted that life's currents may occasionally move a
friend in different directions & if that was a friend's choice -- then so be
it. That perspective is one of the
ways we saw ourselves as different from "gays" (who it seemed - oddly
wanted a male/female dynamic to exist between
only men).
And while the world of porn showcased sexuality with all
of the tact of a jackhammer screwing a tube of grease; --0ur interactions, by
comparison, were so subdued that I've actually pulled it off in a hotel - sharing
a bed with a buddy when the other bed was shared by 1-2 people who didn't have a
clue what was going on 2 meters away! I've got some lofty standards
for the guys I share the sack with -so most of my buds are "coincidently" good look'n,
masculine guys - well built; -- & I work out too.
One
of the most sensual & attractive aspects of intimacy with a masculine guy was
the dimension of trust. Well developed men have the ability to literally kill
with their bare hands because of the strength & ability to fight using precision
movement. It is a personal accomplishment & statement of character to
develop a deep, trusting friendship with a man who is by nature - an aggressive personality.
Building such a friendship is not like meeting Mr. Rogers while skipping thru
his "won't you be mine" neighborhood. Fred was probably a nice
guy --but for a plutonic friendship. His spiked-hair, football
playing nephew "Todd" who get's D's in English & can't articulate
his feelings with little more than a grunt & shrug -- is more along my line
of "attractive". "Todd" - whoever he may be - is
generally not dumb, but extremely right-brained (often with a equalizing
weakness on the left side). Such men are generally more instinct-driven
& not given to vindictive or pretensive behavior because they lack the faculty to predict
conversation's directions. "Strong & silent" - because the
left hemisphere (verbal) is out in the cold as to the inner thoughts that drive
these guys. I find the traits to be an attractive challenge to build trust
& intimacy with. The goal is always the same: To develop a rock-solid
friendship -extended family that finds comfort in the bedroom as well as
unconditional love & support without. And time after time I have
discovered that many of these guys are open to g0ycentric relationships while
loudly opposing the spectre of gay-genderfuck.
It
was while I was at my second high-school that I began to notice, what I call:
"The Faggot Influence".
This happened to some guys who - for whatever reason, believed that their attraction
for hott guys was exclusive to themselves and the "gay
minority". There was a guy named "Dale" that I wanted to
ramp-up the friendship level with, -but before I could indict him into my core
group of friends,
-he "came out" as "gay" & joined the school's gay
support thingy. By the end of the year, the guy was a major "fag"
who had morphed into a girl-like persona who was all lisps & rainbows. I mention him because by his junior year in
college, he was HIV+ -no doubt from giving/taking 'it' up the tailpipe.
In contrast: I've never had an STD & the few "close" fiends who caught
something - got it from a woman! The "FAGS" are quite a different story ...
consistently, predictably:Shamefully...
So, having seen this happen to a number of guys - I've
reached the conclusion that the "gay" community is it's own worst
enemy. It is also a
devastating source of bad education, misinformation
& blatant lies. Even worse is the fact that it cannot self-censor, so
it continually speaks contradictory messages all given in the name of
"gaydom". It is a social Clusterfuck! Any naive guy who believes that
he's part of "that minority" & joins them -- very often takes on all of the "gay
mantras" - including an informal education about "gay sex" - ButtPlunging. The irony is that it's a subculture built
on a series of lies about male sexuality and the guys who get snared into it are
those who didn't say "no" to perilous stupidity. The saddest commentary
is when groups like our peer-group get exposed and the FAGS want to "declare our's as
their's". This provides fodder for the "gay mantra" that
insists that "some athletes are even 'gay'". Of course,
"gay", when used like that means, "Likes his own gender".
However, we all
know that the term gay (by extension) really means, "Likes to ass-fuck own gender".
Everyone
knows that's the stereotype. What makes the stereotype reality is that the
predominant gay media showcases it as the defining "gay sex act".
Gay's ARE Ass-Fuckers. It's their collective ASSertion.
It is also the hallmark of a guy who has completely bankrupted his masculine
ethos. Fags spread injury, disease & death better than any other demographic
on the planet via the ass-fuck.
The g0ys don't. And if that dynamic doesn't illustrate the paramount distinctions
between GAY/G0Y, -then go find a willing arse & keep a proctologist on
speed-dial beside the number for the VD-treatment clinic.
One thing that my buds & I share is a love
& respect for each other that goes beyond mere words. I cannot fathom a group so
devoid of a moral conscience that it would encourage its members to participate
in acts that rip the ass out of its members
(quite literally) or give their partners a banquet of fuck'n diseases from AIDS
to worms! And the test that fags now get -that for years
was something only women got: A Pap-smear! How fuck'n 'masculine' is needing a
Pap-smear! WTF!
And then there are the Fags who
insist that if you don't give/take it up the ASS -that
you're Not really "GAY". Let's watch them debate that opinion with the
"GAYS" who say that simply liking the same sex makes you
"GAY".
"No they're not!"
"Yes, they are!"
"No, they're not! Is this going to come to blowths..."
I can already visualize the purses &
high-heels flying. Like I said: "Genderfuck'd up!".
G0YS bring clarity & sanity to a group of men who know
the difference between loving their buddies vs. ass-fuckers.
The latter have no conscience -hence no ability to temper their behavior
(despite decades of blatant evidence) (despite decades of blatant evidence)
(despite decades of blatant evidence)
(despite decades of blatant evidence)
(despite decades of blatant evidence)
(despite decades of blatant evidence)
(despite decades of blatant evidence) that shows how destructive the
is. Bad company corrupts good character; -& that principle is why more
G0YS need to call it as it is - while spreading the message that there is a
distinct choice for guys who love their buds while feeling an aversion away from
"gay".
Lots of guys are literally dying to hear the G0Y message!
G0YS: Clarity, Sanity,
Moral-Distinction!
|