|
  In
1948,
Alfred
published research that indicated that
over
half of
the male population had experienced one or more sensual/sexual encounters
with other men. Despite controversy surrounding some of his
methodology, --
mounting evidence continues to confirm that many
of his findings were indeed, - accurate.
Likewise, since this
website went on-line, it has drawn the fire of criticism from many
directions & has been misrepresented by some who would rather
slander, than offer a rational argument for their posturing.
We
merely ask that you, the visitors - look for yourselves, read
the various essays posted by our g0ys contributors, & -then-
thoughtfully draw your own conclusions!
| "With
both
the anti-gay and pro-sodomy groups stridently opposed to the
views of the G0YS, -it makes you wonder why neither group can
rationally accept the g0ys' time-proven message of: love &
respect of the masculine - framed in honesty, dignity, health &
self-control." - Unbekannt
|
So, You think that
you're the "Only One"?
  You may be
here because you feel completely alone in your situation. After
all, you're basically a regular guy who behaves like any other regular
guy. You may even date women or be married. But, deep
inside, you deal with strong feelings of real warmth + genuine
affection for other guys too. You've seen the media's take on
the "gay" community; & not only do you N0T relate to that
image, but you find many of the practices repulsive to your basic
value system.
The truth is, you're a guy who really loves
masculinity & appreciates those traits in other men, while
simultaneously finding actions that effeminize masculine men to be
grossly distasteful <link>. You probably look forward to
holidays with
your buds -- especially those times when you can horse around, wrestle
& even be a little tender -- like when you've had a few beers
(or maybe just got done pinning the guy down wrestling) & you find
your arm around him, resting a
hand on his upper or lower back in a casual, reaffirming hug. You're
the definition of "respectful", but you want to be closer, too.
 The mind-blowing truth is simply this: Odds are greatly in your favor
that the majority of your buds feel the same feelings in various
degrees! Resolution comes by understanding
what's truly good & natural behavior, -as opposed to "shameful disrespect"
masquerading as "progressive gay-culture". Are you ready to live a more
abundant life by learning to apply wisdom to your thought process
-while rejecting the fool's errands society's educated fools task the
vulnerable with?
So,
once a guy discovers that other guys are also receptive to M2M intimacy - without the 'RAUNCH'
-- he often has an extreme epiphany, - where he realizes that
feelings of deep
compassion for some of his peers are totally normal, ethical
& part of natural, masculine affection. And, -most of these
same guys do N0T relate to what they
see the mass-media portray as: "GAY"! Such men are 'G0Y
(spelled with a ZER0)'; -- & the mind blowing truth is:
We (g0ys) represent the
majority of men! And because that's the
truth - you won't need switch off your higher brain functions, nor abandon
(nor compromise) your ethics, nor breach your relationship with God (as some men have been falsely led to believe).
For those with questions along Theological lines -see the "God
Hates" section to the left!
Two out of
Every Three Guys?
 You love the
contact & would like to be closer, but you have these fears that
people might think you were a "queer". However,
you have no
desire to put anything up the other guy's arse, but the fact remains that you'd
majorly enjoy cuddling up with the
dude; - slow rubb'n on him & seeing where it leads. You're into masculine guys but you're not "gay" -- at
least not like the media portrays "gay" as being all about!
You don't care about any media programming with the word "Queer" in it; nor
do you relate (at all) to men who prance about with the same mannerisms as the
guys in the movie: Bird Cage. .
You're not
alone.
Statistics suggest over +63% of the dudes around you deal with similar
feelings!
Another
fascinating observation is of the number of groups appearing on the
internet that exploit the term "g0y" - spelled w. a zer0; --without
actually holding to the g0y-philosophy! What a bunch of
"0xyMorons"!
Remember, -we warned you about their existence!
'When people began to use the term "GAY", it primarily meant
"Same-Sex-Attracted". G0YS have no issue with that
original, simple meaning.
However, over time, -the term has taken on lots of
ASSociated-baggage as a
result of stigmas from stereotypes - many aggressively &
shamelessly promoted in the "GAY
MALE COMMUNITY" itself.
 It is one thing to be slurred by
"outsiders"; -- However, the bulk of Gay-male stigmas are
promoted as "gay-culture" from within the "gay-male
demographic". When a group declares itself
"anathema", what appeal to "tolerance"
remains? None!
The current general
use of
the term now brings
a series of images to people's minds that actually have nothing
to do with simple SameSex attractions (but are now inseparably welded to the
word in the public psyche). The use has become so distorted over
time -that saying "gay-sex" is now generally
presumed as synonymous w. "anal-sex"
(even the mass-media regularly interchanges the
two). Not only does the "GAY COMMUNITY" seem
"ok" with
that stereotype, but heavily promotes it -& many
others just as debased.
As a result, G0YS find the current use of the term "GAY" to be
vulgar, & acutely repugnant to our ethos. Our disrespect of the
term reflects our feelings about the contemporary implications (implied
stigmas/stereotypes);
-not a disdain for the original (simplistic) use. Please bear this in mind whenever you see any
g0y commentary critical of "GAY".'
-
G0YS Founder
G0YS
are NOT into the butt-nasty & as a result:
The "gays" even say that G0YS are not "gay"!
"Men
who didn't like anal intercourse . . . were often told that they
themselves were not truly gay." - B.
Weintraub (author)
|
The ACTUAL Reason for so-called 'Homo Hate':
 See: Most men
regard the concept of being "arse-phuck'd"; - 0r
even being
associated with
"arse-phuckr's" as a completely debased situation.
Men who rape men use that form of
assault for a reason:
It is the ultimate statement of disrespect. (The
original use of the word "FUKK"
was a 'cuss' insinuating Anal-Penetration. It is
the verbal approximation of the nonverbal noises
ASSociated
with the term's meaning.
So then, the term "FUKK YOU" has a very specific
meaning when spoken as a curse!)
Since the media, & now society, - generally
ASSert:
That "All Same-Sex Affection = 'GAY'", &
that "GAY*sex*" =
"ANAL*sex*"; -- Most people logically connect the term "gay"
with ; - something that they'd never do to their buddies!
The real issue is not male/male intimacy; -- It's
the dirty, disrespectful & even dangerous attitudes towards
masculinity such as 'ANAL*SEX*
& GenderPhuck;
& most men want absolutely nothing to do with those forms of
moral turpitude. And, like it or not: Guys who wear the "gay" label
make themselves guilty by ASSociation w. a group that loudly
TOLERATES EVERY
perversion under the sun -& calls that clusterphuck: "gay pride"!
We, however, believe that pride should be earned.
G0YS are
here to redeem Man to Man Intimacy & Dignity from the reputation given
to it by a mob of decadent, arse-phuck'rz & the complicit
reprobates they
now claim to speak for!
|
|
"Forget the former
things; do not dwell on the past. See, I am doing a
new
thing!
Now it springs up; do you not perceive it?
-
ISA
43:18-19 |
 That talk
about 'FAGS' isn't about basic "M2M"!
 This
website examines many stereotypes about guys who are affectionate on
other dudes (M2M -Male-to-Male Affection); -- & it smashes the
"gay" stereotypes with a line of thinking that is
backed by an ancient paradigm; - the major truth being that guys
who luv guys are in the majority & most often do N0T identify with what is labeled as
"GAY" by the media! You see, there is a
growing body of
study
(I/E: above Kinsey stats)
showing that it is completely natural for most men to feel
warmth, affection & compassion toward other men. However, in a
society where the modern-media almost exclusively shows men who "love" men as
effeminate, milquetoast, nellie, & into anal sex, -- the
LIE
that is loudly broadcast is that "Normal men feel affection only for women,
but men who are tender on other men are into "ASS-SEX"." That message
(a gigantic fukk'n lie), is relatively new - since the post-mid 20th century.
Prior to,
&
well recorded in history,
are cultures of men who loved masculinity, - and were N0T into anal-sex or
the feminization of other
guys. And the
truth is, that there are lots of guys who luv other guys & would love
to cuddle up (not with everyone, but w. the buds they appreciate)
without anyone getting it up the arse! However the stigma of "gay
sex" & the media images around what "they" say about men who luv men
"do", - scares the social-daylights out of most guys, & prevents them from
being honestly affectionate toward other guys!
There is a paranoid
section of society (eternally on the proverbial witch-hunt) that has
become so disconnected with the reality of natural affection,
that any demonstration of affection is seen to be some sort of
'foreplay' & a butt-fukk precursor.
Society, especially
western, is becoming more dysfunctional with time, - not less!
The proverbial inmates, -for a major part, - have indeed, taken over
"the asylum"!
| Without the divisive &
fictional concept of a
'heterosexual-norm', - modern fallacies like "sexual orientation" become as
farcical as the medieval concepts of a sun circling a flat
earth! Renew your mind! |
|
Aren't you G0YS just being homo-phobic?
 The term "phobic" comes from the
root "PHOBIA" - meaning fear. Being guys who are into guys,
it seems fairly obvious that we're not afraid of guys into guys.
What g0ys see as a paramount issue is the SELF-INFLICTED-REPUTATION that has
swallowed the gay community & the need to distance ourselves from
that reputation. Why? Stigma
(See analogy to
the right).
For example, what does dressing in drag
have to do with being a guy into guys? Clothing is a
cultural thing, so why do so many people associate cross dressing
with "gay"? In other words: If "gay" is
merely about who a person is attracted to - as so many people
blindly assert; -- then why make the connection with Drag, or
other Intersexed behavior? Where are all the "Drag-queen
friendly, Straight" bars, eh? The glaring implications of this
common 'miss-association mindset' are obvious.
 The psychology of many "gAy" men into
"drag" is a fixation on what is perceived to be feminine.
However, the fixation is more often about "form" than actual
function. This MISSPERCEPTION,
-- that places "form" on a pedestal, - invariably leads to
sexual
expression that is likewise - more about form - than function:
ANAL. This is a psychosis - & an unhealthy,
gender-bent, fetish-driven fantasy-life. Sexual-orientation
is not the issue.
To reiterate: What does being a guy who is variably sexually-interested in guys
(which is statistically, -normal) - have anything whatsoever to do with
gender-bending in any way shape or form?
Answer:
Absolutely nothing; - & g0ys find the mixing of the concepts to be
deceptive & morally-offensive. We are men who happen to love
men/too. It has nothing to do
with the feminine. Implying otherwise is simply a LIE.
Human nature being what it is -- we
don't expect many gAys (up to their collective arse-holes in
lie-based fetish-fantasy), -to embrace what is g0y: Quite the
opposite... And you know ... g0ys really don't care.
G0YS detest the concept
of playing in another person's butt.
We're not the only
group that feels this way; And you'll notice I used the gender-neutral
term "person", & not "guy", -- because whether male or female ... butt-play is
a dangerous fetish. Many like myself consider it
immoral because
AnalSex is by far (+5000%) the primary vector for STDs
globally (which is why a man who calls himself
"gay" is +4400% more likely to have a serious STD than
the "Non-gay" population! Source:
CDC)!
This point is made in several places on this site because the
stigma around it is predominant in the public psyche, -- butt
guys into the ButtSex-practice seem oblivious to that fact & exhibit a general callous
disregard for the safety of themselves & others by their
apathetic acceptance of such dangerous actions. The language such guys
use to address other guys into this fetish is likewise gender
degrading: "Girl", "Bitch", "Queen", etc.
It's more evidence that there are elements in 'gAy' culture that
deride masculinity, & do not know how to treat men as men in
general. One writer observed that the 'gAy male culture'
seems schizophrenic: On the one hand idolizing hyper-masculinity,
& on the other hand seeming preoccupied with 'drag'.
Bizarre role models result in bizarre group behavior -- hence the
preoccupation with anal-fetishes. However, just a great meal does not involve a bowl of shit for dessert;
-- Neither does making love
to another guy have anything to do with his anus. G0YS are
N0T under the influence of any delusion that might suggest that anal penetration might
somehow equal "sex". Penetration only equals sex with women &
only when
genital-to-genital; -- Never anal. G0YS refuse to be ASSociated
with a culture that is framed in the mind of the public as a bunch
of shit-tainted, arse-phuckers. We choose the term "G0Y"
because we are men who reject all the 'baggage' ASSociated with
"gAy" & the "gAy-male community". G0YS find it grossly
offensive. Human nature being what it is -- I don't
expect guys into anal-fetishes to embrace what is g0y: Quite the
opposite... And you know ...
g0ys really don't care what those
with a hom0cidal
feces fetish think.
|
Gay'N-Eze:
The Breakdown Behind "Gay-Thinking &
Speech":
"GAY"
men who come to this website & then criticize the content have been a
bizarre fascination since it's inception. The criticisms seem to revolve around
a set of suppositions about "what g0ys believe" that nowhere occurs on
this site. And after several years of looking over the objections voiced
over and over again, -I have figured out exactly WHY "GAYs" can't seem
to "get it". It's because the thought process of certain people
-particularly gender-bending men, -is incapable of understanding certain forms
of logic based on verbal descriptions of certain boolean mathematical
set-principles.
Consider the image to the right. It is a graphic composed of (2) conditions:
Black & White pixels. There is ONLY black and white in the image and these
are demarcated with terms and arrows indicating which is which. Down the
vertical center, the pixels transition from one state to the other in a straight
line with no shades of gray anywhere.
But, -if you mouse-over the image, -you'll see the "GAY version' of the
same principle. Let me explain to you the analog between the graphics and
how they relate to logical fallacy. (GAYs probably won't be able to grasp
this concept: Words mean things.)
There is a fundamental
syllogistic fallacy (reasoning
error) that can be described by following generalization:
"Two separate categories are said to be
connected because they share a common property." That flaw in reasoning is promoted time &
time again by people who insist that: Because (2) groups (g0y &
gAy)
share a common property (M2M sexuality), that they are connected
(Ergo: Both "Gay"). (If
Set(A) contains (x) and Set(B) contains (x) THEN Set(A)=Set(B)).
Whether (A)=(B) is completely dependant on WHAT
constitutes the ENTIRETY of each set -- not simply a
partial component list.
G0YS insist that a common element with "gAys" doesn't make us any more part of the
"GAY" community than bottled-water can be called "piss"
merely because both contain Water. It may
sound like an absurd comparison to most ears -in light
of common-sense; --But the gay-male community has proven
repeatedly that it cannot understand such distinctions
nor recognize the imperative need for such. Philosophically, the fact that the term "gay" is
nebulous (lacking a clear social definition), -constitutes a basis for the need for a distinction;
-Because today, many people (both from within & without the gay community)
associate the term "gay" with forms of behavior that many people find
morally reprehensible - even criminal. The
inability of the gay-community to police itself or set any standards
within, constitutes a set of repugnant traits that form the basis for
g0ys to make the distinction between "WE" vs. "THAY"
(g0ys vs. gays).
And when I say "standards", -I'm NOT talking about abstract social or
religious rules based on mere dogma. No. The "standards" I'm speaking from
are derived from a clear, well documented pattern of "predominantly
gay-identified behavior" that kills &
maims other people (such as Analsex). Some +5000% more perilous than
anything else & ALWAYS damaging to the person on the receiving end;
-Not only is the "gay" community incapable of drawing the line agaist
such as a "standard", -but actually celebrates the perilous practice
as the "defining gay act"! Gays refuse to recognize the
deadly difference between roulette vs. Russian-roulette! G0YS avoid
the "GAY-casino".
Some people, (who cannot seem to
understand our sense of incredulity & disgust about the reputation
that "gay male" community has brought upon itself) accuse g0ys of
being "self loathing" or words to that effect. So, once again - I'll
clarify our position to those who make such assertions: We don't
loathe ourselves. We loathe their
complicit
arses. If you don't understand the difference
between "we" & "they", -I'm sure that there are available, -several
great books for preschoolers with big colorful pictures that help
explain the difference between those pronouns.
|
So then: G0YS are not "phobic" at
all. It's a healthy aversion away from the
group that calls itself "GAY" ("GAY" wanting to claim all same-sex
affections as it's own, and then, coincidentally, submerge
them all by ASSociation
into a moral-cesspool of perilous-fetishes &
genderphuck). Most men happen to
strongly agree with g0ys on a gut level -whether or not they're
open in admitting it. If this is not you or
you feel some need to defend "all things gay", then
you're in the wrong place. Clear enough?
Click here to exit this site...
The
Experiment that has Been My Life:
(an
Editorial
Contribution)
 Blessed with above-average looks &
a leadership personality, I've had a the opportunity to experience
first hand what so many people won't admit happens among guys.
 Since becoming sexually mature, I've realized that I bonded
emotionally with other guys & I enjoy the physical aspect of close
relationships. I'm also attracted to an honest, masculine
personality. "Effeminate men" are a turn off -- no matter
how good they look (If I wanted a girlie, I'd date one).
Into sports like I was, -I was always
around "tough guys" & in the mind of most of my peers, -- I was
one too. My experiences with so-called "Straight guys" who
turned out to be "g0y" are fairly numerous, & started early on.
Unlike the 'gay culture' portrayed in the media as all about "painted
nails" & the
next piece of tail, -- my relationships with my buds was never
considered "casual" in my mind, & the level of friendship's
bonds remains
the deepest & most intimate even till this day. I consider them
all members of my extended family & very few know the details of
each of my relationships or the relationships' depths; - nor do I pry into
their
private lives. As a
contributor to the article on this site about "G0YDAR", I can
tell you that this is N0T about "seducing straight men".
It's about getting to know another guy so well he drops his guard
& lets you discover that he was g0y all along. I'm amazed at
the number of "gAy" guys who will accuse
the G0YDAR article of being a
"manual to seduce straight men", -- and in the next breath insist
that sexual orientation is "fixed". They'll insist that you
can't make a gay guy straight; -- while suggesting that the
article on G0YDAR helps make straight guys "gAy"!
Hypocrites! What g0ys
understand by instinct is that we don't embrace
the stigmas surrounding what society says is "gay". Most g0ys are in 'deep
conservative cover' & many are
ironically oblivious
to the fact that there are many
other people like them on the planet. It can be a painful
existence feeling isolated -- believing that you have nobody
on earth to talk to about how "you" feel.
0ur's is group that
G0YDAR attempts to find. Kinsey hit on the 'g0y' phenomenon
when he compiled his statistics way back in the 1940's. When
you read the statistics about men who have had at least one erotic
encounter with another guy --- that's the mere boundary of G0Y (& it
substantially exceeds 50%)! It's a complex
psychology, but so many g0ys are afraid of the 'gAy label" that they
feign to be "100% str8" -- that is until they meet
another guy they are overwhelmed by. Such guys are not
living discretely for failing to announce their passions to the world. They're
simply g0y; -- & until this movement -simply haven't had a
group philosophy they could identify with (a huge number of so-called
'bi-sexual' men are indeed, g0y -
because the truth is: most men are, indeed, amBisexual).
 
"One of the
primary reasons why the g0y men's movement struck such a
positive chord was the fact that I could describe myself with
a single term that relayed my sense of
respect
for masculinity -& the simultaneous
disdain for "lifestyles"
that debased it; -- Compared to the stark contrast of
applying the "gAy" label & then trying to explain all the ways
that I wasn't like the stereotypes (especially those pushed by
the 'gay-male community' itself). It doesn't take a
rocket-scientist to see that 'g0y' makes a much better first
impression than the stereotype images conjured up with the use of 'gAy'
-even if that first impression consists of a
lingering question."
- Curt R Esident |
|
|
