Deconstructing a "Doctrine of Demons"

The Bible Passages Twisted by Mis[translation/application]
To Falsely Condemn Same-Gender-Attracted People
(Special thanks to theological content contributors)


Genesis 19:5
Leviticus 18:22
Leviticus 20:13
Deuteronomy 23:17
Romans 1:26-27
I Corinthians 6:9
I Timothy 1:9-10
Jude 1:7


"onathan: You were very delightful to me; your love was wonderful to me, exceeding the love of women." - King David

Sloppy apologists sometimes try to explain away the verse above by claiming Jonathan was simply David's "best friend". If that's so easily explained - perhaps those same apologists can name a "best friend" they have had who's "love exceeded the love of women."! The spouse of "said apologist" should be delighted to hear about "said friendship"! No? David meant what he wrote! Prince Jonathan - in DIRECT lineage to the throne said that David was going to rule & he would be beside him! Why would a man give up the right to rule a kingdom & then bind his name in covenant to sit beside the King he abdicated to! Think! The term is "Paramour"! Only someone who lacks basic empathy would dare to try characterize such an expression of intimate affection as anything other!

G0YS: Beyond Exonerated

Those who've taken the time to look carefully into the various facets of this matter will soon come to agree that the situation isn't merely the simple exoneration of men who experience same-gender attractions.  The Torah (Law of God) isn't silent about those who falsely accuse others - but instead, deals out the same penalty to the false accuser that would have fallen on those whom they falsely accused.  The principle is codified in Dt 19:16-19.  And notice that the passage makes it clear that those doing the false-accusing are EVIL. The irony is that the same people who have been so vocal in their "anti-same-sex" rhetoric are the very people to whom the exact same judgment falls - the penalty that they have been declaring on those they falsely accuse (actually falls on themselves)!  If hell didn't exist prior to their rantings against same-gender affectionate people; -- it would be created especially for the false-accusers so that the Scripture could be perfectly fulfilled! The same sentiment regarding like-measures is repeated in the New Testament: "For with whatever judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with whatever measure you measure, it will be measured to you." - Mt 7:2 And St. Luke records Jesus explaining the principle with even more metaphors: "Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven; give, and it will be given to you - in good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will it be put into your lap. For with the measure you use it will be measured back to you.” 
 Yeshua (Jesus) also told them a parable: “
Can a blind man lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit?  The disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone when he is fully trained will be like his teacher. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite! First take the log out of your own eye...
"!  For a long, long time - many so-called "men-of-God" have been grievously violating the Scriptures as they called for "repentance" in ways that the Scripture itself does not call for; -& from people to whom have no reason to repent from what these preachers assert!   For a long-long time, many so-called "men-of-God" have led crusades against people who have not committed sin - but were indiscriminately lumped together with those that did!  MILLIONS of people have been victimized (say "victimized") by the lies & false doctrines pushed into the public psyche by religious-hacks and con-men ... men who didn't know the actual underpinning Scriptures - even themselves!  They were "blind leading the blind" - just as the Scripture characterizes them.  And the trail of misery & lives-destroyed as a result - is a mountain of grievous sin piled to heaven that literally damns those who unrepentantly pushed it!  In addition to rightfully dividing the Scripture and freeing men with the truth; -The G0YS movement unapologetically casts an escalated level of guilt back into the faces of those people who have misused the Scripture to condemn the innocent as the guilty! Such men have used their positions of great influence to pervert the Scripture's message instead promoting a doctrine of demons to the persecution & destruction of generations of innocent people - all in the name of God!  Satan is undoubtedly proud of them! If you look carefully at the lives of such men - You'll discover that they are FRAUDS - often ensnared in the very behaviors that they so openly condemn!  If He doesn't put them in the 1st rail-car headed into hell - He'll owe Sodom an apology! But we don't need to speculate on their end because the Scripture tells us all about their method of operation and their endingHow's that for a closing move in life's proverbial game of Othello!

G0YS: Pendulum

The proverbial G0YS pendulum of rebuke swings 2 ways. We hold in contempt (2) groups of people.
The 1st group consists of men who push the message that same-gender affections innately involve perilous actions like AnalSex. You'll know them because their vocabulary continuously misrepresents anatomy of one gender in terms of the other; -Usually steering towards using their "manginas" for penis-parking.  They're schmucks who promote man-slaughtering mindsets at best; -To murderous at worst. And their own mouthpieces openly admit to that!
The 2nd group consists of people who distort the Scriptures & use those distortions as a broad-brush to paint all people who tend toward same-gender affections -with the same slanderous & indiscriminate tone. Especially culpable are those clerics who are in leadership positions. There is a place deep in hell for the likes of those self-righteous liars & there are so many among their numbers that hell may need to enlarge itself to accommodate them! Such will be like the religious hypocrite whom Yeshua described in his account of his friend - Lazarus. The lies told by these lazy, indiscriminate religious liars has been the cause of untold numbers of teens being put out of their homes and created such a negative, anti-God atmosphere of hostility in the parts of society they've influenced -that many people have become so miserable & depressed that they killed themselves &/or others!  The sexuality of these victims wasn't the cause of their victimhood; - But the toxic reactions & influence of the messages pushed by those religious-liars! By altering the specific mitzvot of the word of God, these messengers of malice simultaneously add -&- take away from the Scriptures' meaning in subject matter so serious that departure from the letter results in death! And as the warning in  Apocalypse says about those who add & take away from  Scripture: Their share is blotted from the Book of Life & the plagues warned of - will be added to them! These are those who had eternity at their fingertips but said in their hearts "I will set my throne as that of the most high"; -Then supplanted the mitzvot of God with their own prejudiced commandments! Liars, thieves & murderers; -All done with their tongues while declaring their misquoted, pseudo-scriptural lies to be "God's word"! Like the Devil - they masquerade as ministers of righteousness! And just like the Devil, they will end the same way! Their sin of falsely accusing men of a capital-crime is so egregious that it is in itself a capital-crime & astonishingly, the Scripture instructs us to NOT pray for them because their sin leads to death (of others and eventually to themselves at the judgment)! These are those who said "YES!" to Satan's offer! They willingly petition the state to come into its servitude! They worship at the altar of money and give an accounting to their state masters of every penny; & each corporation they form to do all these abominations even has a number for its name!   G0YS hold the 2nd group (which we analyze in much closer detail to the right) in greater contempt than the 1st & there is more hope for the former than the latter! If you don't understand WHY groups such as "Focus on the Family" are tools of the Devil - then you've been blinded by him!            

NOTE: G0YS apologetics does not attempt to justify nor defend the bankrupt theology of the likes of the MCC church!  As mentioned elsewhere, - the morally-vacant theology of MCC-type churches attempts to water down the Scripture or use "excuses" to justify why they treat the mitzvot of the Torah as "obsolete".  Their failure to identify the specifics of WHAT the Torah forbade (& more importantly: WHY) -- makes the remainder of their arguments nonsensical, self-serving & heretically destructive.  Do not confuse or confound the well-reasoned theological position of the G0YS men's movement with that of MCC'esque anti-scriptural rants.
As one reader commented:
"I read through the theological rebuttal on the site ( I was dumbfounded and then elated. The theological ruminations of the main apologists for the Gay Christian movement are so hollow, that I could never accept them as the basis for my Christian walk. But the explanations on the G0ys site actually open up Scripture and tear away the centuries of cultural Christianity that has nothing to do with what God is actually saying."


So, the proper understanding of the EXACT prohibition described in the Scripture regarding male/male & male/female intimacy can be used as a theological litmus test to determine how corrupt the theological platform of a certain group may possibly be.
After all: If a group holds to a doctrine that falsely condemns people merely because of the genders they pair-bond with - essentially accusing them
FALSELY of a capital-crime; -Then you should treat - very suspiciously - everything that group teaches. It is NOT morally possible to callously entertain a doctrine that falsely damns a chunk of society, and yet, have right-standing with God.  You cannot CURSE INNOCENT PEOPLE and truly claim to love God!  It is written: 'If anyone says, “I love God,” but hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen.' - 1Jn4:20

And let me add that the proper understanding of the exact prohibition of Scriptures like Leviticus 18:22 also condemns the message of those so-called "churches" who do not take a hard stance against anal-sex (because it so frequently spreads diseases that maim & kill people).  LOVE does not block a truth that protects men from harm! To those coward groups of churchainity - I say: "Quit coddling sociopaths"!  It is written: "For he that eats and drinks (passover / communion) unworthily, eats and drinks damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body." - 1Cor11:29

And sadly,  this proverbial litmus-test - testifies against the vast majority of sects & denominations (at least at the time of this writing)! Caveat!

It is written: "Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a man can commit is outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body." - I Cor 6:18. Paul is making a massive distinction here. So, how is it a person commits a "sin" against their PHYSICAL BODY?  Obviously - by harming it! It's self-evident!  Common-sense confirms this! Analsex spreads diseases over +5000% better than even oral! And, it is also the primary vector of physical injury to the anus of the recipient. Ask any proctologist who their biggest patient pool is from & they'll tell you: People who do the butt-nasty! Furthermore, AnalSex can turn bacteria that would normally not cause a problem into an infection! It's called "Non Specific Urethritis" and so-called "healthy" people suddenly come down with it when AnalSex becomes part of their practice! Ask any urologist: "Who comes down with NSU more than any other demographic?" and they'll tell you: People who do the butt-nasty! This is why so many legal codes classify AnalSex as a tort.

Thanks to the availability of modern research tools; -Anyone with a computer & some ambition can search the original language Scriptures for themselves! Several centuries of MIS-TRANSLATIONS / LIES - systematically perverting the Scripture and literally INVENTING a SIN - called "HomoSexuality" are now manifest! And when confronted with these FACTS (Say "Facts"), what do most factions do? Will they repent! To do so would admit that for centuries the self-proclaimed bastions of righteousness have been routinely committing the capital crime of falsely accusing other of such! And the fact that so many are slaves to pride is an indicator of who their real "god" actually is!

Will have "Queer Dreams", etc:

I attended a church camp as a teen. At the mature age of 15 I fell in love with a guy who was 14. That was 40+ years ago. So, yeah ... I am sure it was LOVE because it still is. But I kept those feelings hidden - other than the fact I loved his friendship & treated him preferentially. And, he was a handsome girl magnet anyway. 2 summers later we were in the same camp cabin again & our bunks were at 90-degree angles to each other. One night after a late day when everyone else was asleep but us (I thought), I reached over onto his bunk & quietly busted into a foot massage on him. He soon turned around in his bunk so I could access his upper body. But, this was also in a time frame when paranoia about "fags" and "who might be one" - was at a peak. About 10 minutes into the massage, he got up & left the cabin without a word. I was confused so about 30 seconds later, I quietly followed him. He had already vanished into the campus so I went to the dock & looked at the stars for an hour or so & then quietly returned to the cabin.

In the morning, our counselor (a man I thought highly of) mentioned twice that he had had "queer dreams" the previous night. I got the message. But I pretended to be clueless. Giving a guy a massage - showing affection, being gentle, feeling warmth to a guy - was referred to as "queer" (& by a "counselor")! Those words cut me emotionally, deeply. Years later, the g0ys movement happened & now I know that my affections were loving & morally pure. It was simply NATURAL AFFECTION toward someone I loved deeply (I was so naive at that time that I didn't even have an aesthetic appreciation of a guy's genitals. I am pointing this out so that you'll realize that my love for my friend had nothing to do with his sexual-physiology. I simply loved his entire being.)! But despite the relative innocence - just my affection for another guy became the brunt of a curse (& that's what the slur "Queer" was being used to describe - same gender affection)! Scripture warns that a time would come when men would lack Natural Affection (as my counselor & many men of my era obviously lacked)! That same twisted, perverse, religion-induced paranoia lives on - even while I type this! Jesus warned that "Broad is the road to destruction & many that go thereon". The massive denominations & megachurches with their millions & broadcast stations are often fakes, UNChristian & responsible for the giant lies that have villianized the deepest most loving friendships among men & put them on par with the  acts of disease-spreading analsex practitioners! The hell & misery they inflicted on me -even as I concealed the nature of my affections - continues till this day. Their lack of discernment has made the word "Christian" a curse among many people! And every pronouncement of damnation these abusive people falsely make at others - awaits them! They'd do well to repent! 
BTW> 4 years later I met my camp buddy at a bar he was working at. I spent the night at his place and gave him a long massage during that stay. It wasn't sexual, but was my way of rebuilding a trust while flipping "Mr. QueerDreams" the metaphorical bird via long distance. 

This material is given in one long page so that you can more easily print it out to read and study and share with others.  You can also move to each main section by clicking on the Scripture references on the left. To help contextualize each passage, consider reading the entire chapter (maybe more). 

Genesis 19:5 
And they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.”

The word "know" in Genesis 19:5 is Hebrew YADA.  It is used 943 times in the Old Testament to "know in depth" God, good and evil, the truth, the law, people, places, things, & can be used to indicate intimacy.  It is a very flexible word, as are many Hebrew words.  In Genesis 19:5, the word was used to express the demand of the people of Sodom that Lot should bring out the strangers in his house so that they could know who they were.  Remember that in the account's detailing of Sodom's recent history - their king had been taken captive and recently rescued.  As a result - those in Sodom did not trust foreigners.  Lot was a foreigner and the foreign men who had been in the city-square earlier had gone to his house.  It is no stretch of the imagination to presume that the men of Sodom were discussing this late into the night.  Many were probably drinking during the discussion (Sodom had a reputation for its wine) & eventually the mob formed that came to surround Lot's home.  Mobs - by their very nature are not monoliths of sound decision makers - but masses of people -often driven by elevated emotions.  Add alcohol and a bit of post-battlefield paranoia and where this was headed was bad in every sense.  The demand to "yada" the strangers was obviously dripping with pretense and Lot saw right thru this.  He knew very well where an interrogation by a mob would very likely lead.  So in an attempt to force them to consider their actions & cause the crowd the relent, - Lot (who was no coward) tried to shame them & simultaneously appeal to any semblance of conscience that might remain in those compromising the mob - by "offering" his 2 unmarried daughters to the mob - so that they would not harm his guests.  But this offer wasn't done in a tone of weakness or fear as usually represented by preachers who discuss this account.  It was done roughly - in a harsh tone & gilded with contempt. How do I know? Because Lot was a man of great wealth and king Solomon observed that "The poor use entreaties, but the rich answer roughly."-Pr18:23  Lot was seething (& rightly so) and the "offer of his daughters" wasn't a cow-tow!  It was an accusing, harsh rebuke - a proverbial glove-across-the-face to the fools outside his door!  And did those in the crowd recognize Lot's tone? Indeed.  "But they said, "Stand aside." And continued, "This one came in as an alien, and already he is acting like a judge; now we will treat you worse than them."!  The sentiment of the mob speaks volumes.  Lot's status as a foreigner was predominant in their thought process and his tone calling their actions into judgment was obvious.  They had no intention of relenting in their heart's inclination - the intent of which included every form of violence from sexual-assault to murder.  So let's be clear: This is not an account of Sodom's artists, dancers, & hair-dressers (nor anyone else "testosterone-deficient") surrounding Lot's house!  This was a basic, high strung, paranoid, drunken mob - not unlike any other mob that may form under similar circumstances in many places around the globe even till this day!  The gender of the angels in Lot's home was irrelevant (or would the account have set better with you if the young men had instead been young women - under the threat of gang rape & worse)!  Think! The primary Scriptural account used for decades by "fundamentalist preachers" to condemn same-sex attractions has nothing to do with same-sex-attractions whatsoever!  Using the same old pattern; -would the Sodom account have been a condemnation against mixed-gender relationships if the angels had been female in appearance?  Let common-sense prevail!  RAPE is a mala-inse' crime (gender being irrelevant)!    The mob wasn't there because it liked the look of Lot's guests.  It was there because Lot was a foreigner who had just welcomed foreigners into his home & the mob was paranoid that Lot was hatching a plot against the city.  Many strangers that the people of Sodom routinely saw were enemy tribes who wanted to capture their valuable fortress and control the trade routes that it protected.  Lot himself was an alien in their midst & in their prejudices, -they questioned his allegiance.  And before you dismiss this line of reasoning regarding the fear of foreigners; - You may want to consider it next time you're at a security screening point and you're asked to step thru a scanner where the scan-operator can see through your clothing! Yada!   

See also Ezekiel 16:49-50;  and Matthew 10:14-15 (hello).  In Jude 1:7, the term "strange flesh" is Greek ἑτέρας (hetero) sarkos ("different flesh" and from which the prefix in "hetero-sexual" comes) and refers here to violating Leviticus 19:19.  It is not homo - but its opposite!

Deuteronomy 23:17
The Authorized King James Version of the Bible translates Deuteronomy 23:17 as "There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel," but the word translated as "sodomite" in the Hebrew original, Qadesh (Hebrew: קדש), does not refer to Sodom whatsoever! The term "SODOMITE" is a complete fabrication (A LIE)! It has been more accurately translated as "shrine prostitute" in many other translations.
This twisting of scripture is literally where the INVENTION of the term "SODOMY" occurred!


"SODOMITE" is an invented term used to label those whom religious hacks allege practice the same 'sins' as Sodom was destroyed for.  G0YS have discovered who the ACTUAL 'SODOMITES' are: I.E: Anyone with a state-marriage-license or those who would incorporate a "church"! "Preposterous!", you wail? Maybe today would be a good day to start studying some actual Scriptural-principles & learn the scope of the laudable self-righteous, ignorant hypocrisy that is the thing called "contemporary Christianity"!  God does not punish the innocent with the guilty! Learn to discern!

The translation of the King James Bible was very political and a number of the translators did not like King James.  It was also rumored that James liked MEN. Letters recovered from that period are the best solid evidence for that assertion.  Being the case, it makes perfect political sense that the creation of a new type of perversion to cast the stain of accusation at the King would benefit his detractors.  So, the "new" translation of the Bible that James himself commissioned - was literally perverted in order to accomplish this end.  Keep in mind that this was also the time frame that Guy Fawkes was caught in the plot to blow up Parliament!  The term that was also coined at the same time, "SODOMY", originally referred to ANAL-SEX or BESTIALITY.  But the meaning of "SODOMY" expanded over time to embrace matters not forbidden scripturally and this expansion is where the translated term became anathema to Scriptural principles!          

Leviticus 18:22
"Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13
"And a man who lays with a male as one lays with a woman; abomination both of them have done; they are certainly put to death; their blood is on them." 
Because these two verses in Leviticus (18:22 and 20:13) have been used more than any other Bible texts to condemn and reject same-gender-attracted people, the following material is offered to help the reader know absolutely for certain what these scriptures are specifically condemning:

HEY! Words Have Meanings! תּוֹעֵבָ֖ה

I find it interesting that the word "ABOMINATION" is used in so many English translations. That word was a word in the language before any Bibles were ever translated into English. So...what did it originally mean?

Abomination: "A thing that causes a feeling of disgust or hatred."

So, "abomination' is clearly the WRONG word to use! The Scriptures we are discussing can often bring the charge of having committed a capital crime against someone. The Torah criminalized the acts that have real-world repercussions - not actions that cause mere "feelings"!  This terminology distinction is colossal in importance!

So, what's a more accurate word? Well, the Hebrew term being translated is "TO'EVAH / TO'EBAH": תּוֹעֵבָ֖ה

The word relays the meaning that actions that are TO'EBAH cause a condition that imperils someone in some manner - the immediate effect - not always being visible.  A way to make an example in the modern vernacular would be to say: "When working with biohazards, anyone who breaches containment safety protocol has committed TO'EBAH and shall surely be fined and/or punished." 
How many people would want to be downwind if smallpox got out of lab containment, for example? That's
תּוֹעֵבָ֖ה TO'EBAH! Understand?

There is a principle in Hebrew Torah reading that teaches that the words used in the commandment (mitzvot) are to be constrained very tightly to the very letter of the text.  This is so nobody ever becomes a victim of wrongful condemnation from misapplying the mitzvot of the Torah. This principle is widely accepted globally in studies of law - even today.  Therefore TRANSLATIONS of the Torah are NOT legally considered to be the Torah!  Translations are legally considered to be "Prima-facie evidence" (at face value) of the Torah and not anything that could be used in themselves to bring a charge against an individual for alleged violations.  In simple terms: You haven't even seen the Torah nor any of its commandments unless you've read them in HEBREW.

So lets take a closer look at the more comprehensive of the texts shown above, Leviticus 20:13:

This commandment's exact prohibition is understood precisely as a result of a single Hebrew letter: כְ

It comes down to the Hebrew root כְּ "kaf"  (expanded: kaf-yod) pronounced "key" - which carries the meaning of "AS/LIKE".  A man who lays with another man AS (in like fashion / penetration) a woman - describes the act of PENETRATION because THAT is what the phrase "lies with a woman" means in the specific legal sense within the Torah. (So, when you get to Romans 1:27 where the Apostle-Paul (a Hebrew lawyer) pens the same word (but in Greek) translated as "LIKEWISE" - he is connecting PRECISELY the nature of the violation in what he writes about in Romans, - AS in what preceded in the Torah. And that connection must be directly cross-referenced to the Torah by the very LETTER ( כְּ )!   What Leviticus 20:13 and 18:22 (& by logical/legal extension Romans 1:26-27) specifically forbid is the act of AnalSex.  That SPECIFIC (say "specific") act is the TO'EBAH that is so grievous that it carries a death sentence! 

The begging question is: "Does the act of AnalSex warrant a death sentence when measured in the other contexts of the Torah?" It turns out that every major health agency on earth from the CDC to the W.H.O. has identified AnalSex as a massively dangerous disease and injury vector - a whopping +5000% more dangerous than even - oral-sex!  If the globe treated the act of AnalSex as a capital-crime, millions of lives could have been saved from the deadly diseases it spreads so effectively <CLICK HERE>!  Therefore when the concept of EQUITY under the Law is used as the standard, then the Torah's own commandment instructs: "In such cases show no mercy; the punishment is to be a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, and a foot for a foot."- Dt 19:21. See, the PUNISHMENT MUST FIT THE CRIME.  Every major health organization on earth has identified the act of AnalSex as an extremely perilous fetish that spreads diseases - many (I.E: AIDS) - ABSOLUTELY DEADLY.  The grievous peril of the act is WHY (say "why") the Torah places it in the category of a mala-inse' capital crime.  Failing to clearly identify the Torah's very-rational, legal reason behind this specific prohibition - is to accuse God of being petty.  G0YS unapologetically defend the rationale behind the Torah's position on the act of AnalSex. Sane & morally-just societies recognize the act as the serious tort that it is.  And the g0ys movement is living proof that men can love men without engaging in that putrid, perilous act. Anal sex, by the very nature of what it causes -- is something that G0YS absolutely do not engage in (the rejection of which is what starkly defines us as G0YS)! 
And herein also lies a warning about so-called "pro-gay churches" that want to dismiss ALL condemnation surrounding the modern cultural "gay" paradigm (including the perils of Anal-Sex). These undiscerning heretics want you to write off the Old Testament (Torah) as if it was a document that was merely ornamental.  And with that theology - they accuse God of being "petty". 
ALL DIVINE LAW IS GIVEN TO PREVENT INJURY & PROTECT QUALITY LIFE.  I.E: It is a MEDICAL FACT that AnalSex is extremely perilous, injurious & disease-spreading at a rate +50 times higher than even OralSex!  ANYONE who downplays the seriousness of those FACTS (Say "Facts") is an enemy of humanity & God!  Scriptures such as Leviticus 18:22/20:13 mean EXACTLY what they say in the context of the original language & overall framing of the Torah; - No more and no less! Every Rabbi knows the specific prohibition is against AnalSex! Now you know WHY! No person acting in the Spirit of God advocates acts that frequently maim & spread deadly diseases!   

Romans 1:26-27 This Scripture (like so many others) can only be understood when read in the context of the Torah which is precisely what the Messianic congregation in Rome -that it was written to - understood!

Romans chapter 1 is one of the most mistranslated, misquoted and mishandled of all the Scriptures in the Bible! It was written by the brilliant apostle named Saul/Paul. St. Peter issued a very stern warning about the nature of some of Paul's writing: "Paul also wrote you with the wisdom God gave him. He writes this way in all his letters, speaking in them about such matters. Some parts of his letters are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction. Therefore, beloved, since you already know these things, be on your guard so that you will not be carried away by the error of the lawless and fall from your secure standing." - 2Pet 3:15b-17

Romans was an epistle written to a Messianic-Jewish congregation by Saul/Paul. The reason it is misrepresented so often is because - to understand it - you need to have a very solid Hebrew understanding of the Torah.  St. Peter states the SPECIFIC SIN those who mishandle St. Paul's writing suffer from: They are LAWLESS ... meaning that they do not academically-handle the Torah (Hebrew Law) in the meticulous manner that it absolutely must be administered.  St. Paul was a Hebrew lawyer and the people who the Romans epistle was written to were Jews - very well versed in matters of rightfully dividing issues in Hebrew law. Most Christians are, sadly, NOT.  The epistle of Romans can be a dangerous & deadly power-tool when held by the likes of "Bubba-Baptist-Bigot-Bible-Blowhard" - which is PRECISELY why Peter wrote what he wrote warning about how some people mishandle Paul's writings!

If you have not already covered the explanations regarding Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13 above, -you MUST read that now because understanding the PRECISE nature of the related Hebrew mitzvot (commandment) is absolutely essential to understanding what Paul is explaining in Romans 1:26-27.

One final point before the analysis of Romans 1:26-27, is something that Paul wrote: "Brothers, I have applied these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, so that you may learn from us not to go beyond what is written. Then you will not take pride in one man over another." - I Cor 4:6

Critical Analysis of Romans 1:25-27:

"Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received within themselves the due penalty for their error." 

We'll begin here: "Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones."
The term "unnatural ones" does not say LESBIANISM! People falsely assume it does due to a failure to use the Torah as a strict guide for understanding the context of what Paul is getting at!
[Warning: Some translations literally read as "lesbianism" (or words to that effect) - although there is not a shred of language in the actual Greek source text that says that! Remember that this section of this website is exposing a doctrine of demons - how a systematic introduction of false doctrine occurred by corruption of the translations. It's absolutely imperative to look at the source language texts & KNOW for yourself!] As you do, you will notice the brazen arrogance of such mistranslations! It is so unscholarly & prejudicial that it becomes a proverbial "smoking gun" in itself!

Remember: In the Torah, there is no commandment against women laying with woman. So, Paul would not add such a prohibition. Doing so would be to go beyond what was written.  However, contact with human feces IS forbidden in Torah. So when the text says that women abandoned NATURAL relations, what you must conclude next - needs to be grounded in the Torah - which does NOT forbid lesbianism, but makes AnalSex a capital crime. People who twist this very specific meaning and enlarge it to imply that it covers all same-sex intimacy, are doing precisely what Peter warned that ignorant, lawless & unstable people would do with Paul's writing! 

The following continues: In the same way (or "likewise" in several translations. This term is a DIRECT reference to the Hebrew letter כְּ -meaning AS or LIKE in Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13 - Torah).

Continuing: "the men also abandoned natural relations with women" (here is where the misunderstanding begins by those who do not know the Torah - in a flawed inference to the previous text about women)

and were inflamed with lust for one another.
The LUST in itself is NOT sin. It often leads there, but itself is not sin.
As it is written: "Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death." - James 1:15
Notice that this text from James fits precisely with what Paul is describing in Romans especially when the extreme perils of AnalSex are factored into understanding the issue!

The next text reads: "Men committed shameful acts with other men". These "shameful acts" violate the specific commandment of the Torah, the כְּ = AnalSex - forbidden to the letter in the Scriptures referenced above by citation: Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13

"received within themselves" The form of the transgression (AnalSex) is HOW they received within themselves. The Greek word is askemosunen and is formed of the word for "outer appearance" plus the negative particle. It speaks of the inner or hidden part or parts of the individual that are not ordinarily seen or known in public. This is what/where AnalSex violates. Bluntly, the penalty (which leads to death) gets WITHIN THEM because AnalSex is catastrophically efficient (+5000% more perilous than even oral sex) at spreading sexually transmitted diseases - many deadly!

"the due penalty for their error." The penalty is DEATH {see Rom 1:32} and since they "receive it within themselves;" -The only rational explanation is that it's a death-penalty via sexually transmitted diseases! According to the American Red Cross, the "Gay Male Community" (which is awash in AnalSex practices) has a rate of Sexually transmitted diseases that is an astonishing +4000% higher than the general population.

On the other hand, lesbians are among the very lowest of STD infection rate statistics! Lesbians generally don't have analsex because they lack the anatomy to do so! Duh! And they have almost NO sexually transmitted diseases as a demographic! 

The Scripture says: "Every other sin a man can commit is outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body." - I Cor 6:18. "Sins against his own body"? How? Physical injury & sexually transmitted diseases; - That's how! So, now we understand WHY Lesbians have almost NO sexually transmitted diseases as a demographic: Because same gender intimacy isn't a sin within itself. Men who abstain from AnalSex as a demographic - have STD rates as low as Lesbians! Because same gender intimacy isn't a sin within itself.

So, the sin of Romans chapter 1:25-27 is absolutely AnalSex (Women with men; -& men with men).
Recall the Scripture above where Paul assured his readers that neither he nor Apollos would go beyond what was written (in Torah). As already exhaustively covered ... the SPECIFIC related prohibition in Torah as every Rabbi knows - is against AnalSex. Paul would NOT move that proverbial boundary-marker - as doing so would be a gross violation of legal principle.

So, Let's take a fresh look at Romans 1:25-27 again in light of this new information:
"Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations [penile/vaginal intercourse] for unnatural ones [via AnalSex w. men].  Likewise the men also abandoned natural relations [penile/vaginal intercoarse] with women and were inflamed with lust for one another - committing shameful acts with other men [violating the Torah's specific commandments against men penetrating men as one would a woman], and received within themselves the due penalty for their error [which was deadly]."  And notice that this Scripture rendering is in harmony with the Torah and makes much more sense when examined in light of global statistics regarding the perils of sexually transmitted diseases spread via AnalSex!

As one reader said: It's much more clear now. So, more bluntly: "Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones.", does not refer to lesbianism, but women exchanged vaginal intercourse for anal intercourse. Paul confirms this when he says "Men committed shameful acts with other men,..." but doesn't draw an equivalent with the women. He does not say "...women were committing shameful acts with other women." I got it! And the term "Likewise" does not indicate the gender composition; - But points to the shameful act of AnalSex ... women w. men, & men w. men.

And it is ignorant, arrogant, religious hacks - prejudiced and ignorant of the Torah - who have used Romans 1 (& others) out of context and have made a global mockery out of Christianity while putting lies in God's mouth and causing generations of people to live/die in despair - believing that God has rejected them due to a sexual orientation that was simply innate.  The lying bastards who have expanded the mitzvot beyond the letter & done this evil - inflicting global misery into the entire lives of millions of people; -They are going to pay with their own souls and drink a double portion of judgment from their very own measure!  Satanicly-deluded, self-serving, lax, lying, life-stealing, & complicit to murder! Propitiated righteousness has no power to save when a man's standard of judgment condemns the innocent!  God damn them if they fail to repent!

I Corinthians 6:9
"The unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God. So do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the realm of God.
The Greek words translated as "effeminate" and "homosexual" in some Bibles - do not even remotely mean effeminate or homosexual! This is, quite frankly, a theological outrage.  The Greek term "arsenokoites" (
αρσενοκοίται), which was formed from two words many questioning scholars think meant  "male" and "bed".  The reason these scholars are "questioning" is because that Greek term hasn't been located in other Greek period texts (That absence is a gigantic hint). Their best guess suggests that it most likely refers to male prostitution - which was a common practice in the Roman world, as revealed in the excavations at Pompeii and other sites. The Torah forbids prostitution or even bringing the earnings of a prostitute into the temple.  Being one is a capital crime and also carries the connotation of a person who betrays a trust. The term was sometimes applied to foreigners who might come to subvert a kingdom.  However, Rahab of Jericho, prior to Israel capturing the city - was such an example (used in a positive sense). Think that over for a bit.

The millennia-long mystery-definition of that term ("arsenokoites" [αρσενοκοίται]) was solved at!

And this point is absolutely mind-blowing! Why? Because the entire New Testament discussion of the subject matter about same-sex attraction uses this very term as a Biblical focus. The entire discussion revolves around this term - And yet: No scholar seems to even know what the word actually means or from where Saul/Paul even derived it - as it is NOT in common Greek period writings! Talk about "the blind leading the blind"!

The term "koites" (κοίται) sounds much like the Latin "coitus" - which would fit awesomely into an anti-analsex doctrine. After all, the Latin term "Coitus" specifically translates: Sexual intercourse, specifically involving penile-vaginal penetration. If only the first part of the term (αρσενο) had a Latin counterpart too ... Oh, wait ... it DOES!!!  "Arsenius", the Latinized form of the Greek name Ἀρσἐνιος, -which means "male, virile". See also: Arsenius (name), Arsen, Arsenović.  
So, if you are a Greek Scholar and have been wondering EXACTLY what Paul meant when he penned "αρσενοκοίται" in this scriptural passage you need to transliterate the term from LATIN (you know - the language of Rome that had conquered the world at the time that Paul wrote this)!  This transliterated term literally means PENETRATIVE MALE ANAL SEX and it fits PERFECTLY and I mean perfectly with the common Rabbinic theological understanding regarding the specific prohibition of Lev 18:22 & Lev 20:13 against AnalSex (covered elsewhere in this document)!    

The term translated "effeminate" is a Greek term (makakoi) that literally means "soft".  More likely it means "morally soft" - like a judge that can be bribed (in one way or another) or a politician that is for sale...or a church-presbyter who fails to stand up for what is theologically correct (& morally right) - as opposed to buckling under that which is popular, traditional & prejudicial.  After all, g0ys theology isn't popular among false religion (where lazy theologians want to sloppily & without textual basis condemn all same-gender attraction); -Nor is g0y's theology popular among the various groups that want to fetishize AnalSex (Many so-called "gay" men hate the g0ys stance on this issue)!  Indeed it is a narrow road - but the moral high-road literally between life & death, nonetheless!  And the Scripture commands that the issue be rightfully divided!  

I Timothy 1:9-10
"Law is not made for a righteous person but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and fornicators and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound (healthy) teaching." 
The Greek word translated "homosexual" in some Bibles - does not say "homosexual" (never has)!!! Again, the term is arsenokoites (αρσενοκοίται). If these "translators" were lawyers - the egregious mistranslation exposed here would be grounds for disbarment!  The source of this term's transliteration from the Latin into Paul's Greek epistle (likely by Paul himself) is explained above.

Jude 1:7
"Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after STRANGE FLESH, are exhibited as an example, in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire."

STRANGE FLESH? The Greek term is: "σαρκὸς ἑτέρας" -- ETERAS SARKOS Notice the term Jude uses is the Greek: "ETERAS" (In English "Hetero" & the Greek opposite of "Homo"/"ὁμο") in describing Sodom's sin! Why? Because whatever Sodom was up to violated Leviticus 19:19 - (mixing different sorts). "STRANGE FLESH". If the issue with Sodom had been SAME-sex attraction, -the author would have used the Greek term that was readily available: HOMO (Greek: "ὁμο").  But, he didn't (hello)! Yet - despite the fact that the author, Jude chose NOT to use the term "Homo" (but its exact opposite - "HETERO"); -this doesn't stop certain translators from twisting his words into the antithesis of what he wrote (apparently they know more than the man who wrote the passage?)! How convenient to put aside the word of God in order to keep their own tradition of prejudice! Many well researched modern scholars believe that the sin of Sodom/Gomorrah that Jude speaks of was the same as that during the time of Noah that produced the Nephilim!

In Conclusion: 5 of the passages: Genesis 19:5; Deuteronomy 23:17, 1st Corinthians 6:9, 1st Timothy 1:10 & Jude 1:7 are blatantly, incorrectly translated. Truth now testifies against a generation of lying-translators from the seminaries who have poisoned the Scripture! And the Scripture itself quite literally damns them for the giant deadly confusion they have foisted upon society! 
The other three Texts: Leviticus 18:22; 20:13 and Romans 1:26-27 are taken out of their original context of condemning the massively perilous act of AnalSex, & are wrongly used to judge and condemn people merely of the same sex who love each other. And the Scripture itself quite
literally damns those who so casually pervert the text that way!

So, Christianity in the 20th century will be remembered by history & summed up this way: "Christianity in the 20th century was a religion that had forsaken its Hebrew roots, denied the most fundamental tenants of the New Covenant and was a crowned by the morbid fear that two people of the same gender might be holding hands somewhere."

I think it's time for serious reformation! You?  

No Bible before the Revised Standard Version in 1946 used "homosexual" in any Bible translation! And this damning fact begs the question: So how did this LIE, this inverse-alchemy slither into the translated Scriptures! It took false translators several hundred years to gradually CREATE the "SIN of HOMOSEXUALITY" by systematically MIStranslating a handful of key Scriptures in ways not even hinted at in the original languages.

Return to document TOP